Striped Marlin

Latin name: Tetrapturus audax

Common name: Marlin

  • Say No

Wild Caught

Eastern Commonwealth waters

Key Facts

  • Striped marlin is a migratory species caught by a number of different countries, including Australia, where the main fishery operates along the eastern coastline.
  • The striped marlin population fished off eastern Australia is overfished and there is a significant risk that further overfishing is continuing.
  • The stock fished by Australia is currently overfished, and as fishing pressure is set too high, overfishing will continue to drive the decline in the stock.
  • Video monitoring of all fishing boats operating in the striped marlin fishery is a welcome advance, improving confidence in fishery log book reports.
  • Striped marlin are caught on longlines that also catch endangered wildlife, such as turtles, seabirds, whales and dolphins.
  • The fishery needs to do much more to protect critically endangered leatherback turtles and will continue to be red-listed in future if appropriate and immediate management action is not taken.

More information

  • Commonwealth Eastern Tuna and Billfish Fishery (163t in 2021)

Striped marlin is found in the Pacific and Indian Oceans and caught throughout its range by fisheries managed by other nations, including Australia, Taiwan, Japan and the Republic of Korea. The majority of striped marlin is caught as a byproduct in fishing targeting tunas off the eastern coastline of Australia, with a small (less than 1t) catch from the western coastline that is not covered by this assessment.

Stock status information indicates significant concern over the population of striped marlin caught in the ETBF, with evidence of high fishing activity and stock declines over a period of decades. The stock fished by Australia is currently overfished, and as fishing pressure is set too high, overfishing will continue to drive the decline in the stock.

Striped marlin are caught using longlines in Australian waters, which also catch a range of threatened species. Independent Video monitoring across the fishing fleet was rolled out in 2015. This welcome progress provides confidence in reporting of wildlife affected by the fishery.

However, video monitoring has identified that fishers were significantly under-reporting how much endangered wildlife was killed in the past, which means that the impact of this fishery is substantially higher than previously thought. Since cameras have been installed on boats, the number of turtles, seabirds, whales and dolphins recorded as caught has significantly increased.

Despite this, most current management arrangements for the ecological risks of the fishery to endangered species is based on unreliable information collected before the implementation of cameras, though there is now seven years of reliable, recent data available to the fishery. This does not represent sustainable management, and will result in continued red-listing of this fishery in future if not urgently addressed.

The catch of turtles in particular has increased over the past decade. From 2018-2021, an average of 122  turtles were caught per year, compared to the 4-16 that were reported as caught annually in the three years before video monitoring was mandated on the fishing vessels. In previous years, a ‘trigger limit’ was in place which required fishery managers to take action if the rate of turtle catch exceeded a certain level. This trigger limit has since been removed, which means there are no measures in place to cap the number of turtles caught in the tuna fishery.

Of particular concern; the ETBF has reported bycatch of between 20-68 critically endangered leatherback turtles per year since 2018. There are only 1000 mature nesters thought to be left in the population impacted by the ETBF, and it is declining at around 6% annually. For context, and demonstrating adequate management, a US-managed longline fishery that impacts the same leatherback turtle population is closed when yearly bycatch reaches 16 leatherbacks. If not for lower leatherback catch since 2020, the fishery was likely to have been red-listed for its bycatch impacts in addition to the overfished state of the striped marlin population. Immediate implementation of measures to reduce leatherback turtle bycatch to safe levels is required to improve from the current GoodFish red-listing in future.

In contrast, better protection arrangements and obligations on the fishery to protect seabirds have resulted in additional management that should effectively reduce the impact of the fishery. This is welcome.

Turtles, whales, dolphins and seabirds are at risk from multiple threats, including fishing. Given the small scale of the Australian tuna fishery relative to international tuna fisheries, it is unlikely that this fishery is the major driver of on-going population declines in these species of endangered wildlife.

Commonwealth marine parks were established in 2018, but in a form significantly delayed and weakened following sustained Australian tuna fishing industry lobbying. As such they confer only a fraction of the protection for threatened and endangered species of original government proposals.