Mahi Mahi

Latin name: Coryphaena hippurus

Common name: Dolphinfish

  • Better Choice
  • Eat Less

Wild Caught

Eastern Commonwealth waters, Western Commonwealth waters

Key Facts

  • Mahi Mahi is a pelagic species caught by a number of different countries in all tropical and subtropical ocean basins. In Australia, mahi mahi are caught as a byproduct in fisheries targeting tunas along the eastern and western coastlines.
  • Mahi mahi populations are poorly understood, but this very fast growing and short lived species is likely highly resilient to fishing pressure and there is confidence that populations are healthy.
  • Video monitoring of all fishing boats operating in the tuna fishery is a welcome advance, improving confidence in fishery log book reports.
  • Mahi mahi are caught on longlines that also catch endangered wildlife, such as turtles, seabirds, whales and dolphins.
  • The small scale western Australian fishery is unlikely to be impacting endangered species populations, but the eastern Australian fishery needs to do much more to protect critically endangered leatherback turtles and is likely to be red-listed in future if appropriate and immediate management action is not taken.

More information

  • Commonwealth Eastern Tuna and Billfish Fishery (ETBF: 53t in 2021), Western Tuna and Billfish fishery (WTBF: 2t in 2019)

Mahi mahi is a fast-growing species found throughout all tropical and subtropical ocean basins. They are very fast growing and short-lived, characteristics that provide resilience against overfishing.

Mahi mahi is not specifically targeted by fishers, but is taken as a secondary species in a tuna longline fishery that operates off the eastern Australian coast.

The ETBF and WTBF mahi mahi fisheries are poorly understood, but low catches and the highly resilient life history characteristics of the fishery give confidence that populations are healthy.

Mahi mahi are caught using longlines in Australian waters, which also catch a range of threatened species. Independent video monitoring across the fishing fleet was rolled out in 2015. This welcome progress provides confidence in reporting of wildlife affected by the fishery.

However, video monitoring has identified that fishers were significantly under-reporting how much endangered wildlife was killed in the past, which means that the impact of this fishery is substantially higher than previously thought. Since cameras have been installed on boats, the number of turtles, seabirds, whales and dolphins recorded as caught has significantly increased.

Despite this, most current management arrangements for the ecological risks of the fishery to endangered species is based on unreliable information collected before the implementation of cameras, though there is now seven years of reliable, recent data available to ETBF and WTBF managers. This does not represent sustainable management, and will result in the red-listing of the ETBF fishery (which operates at a much larger scale than the WTBF, leading to greater impact) in future if not urgently addressed.

The catch of turtles in particular has increased over the past decade. From 2018-2021, an average of 122  turtles were caught per year in the ETBF, compared to the 4-16 that were reported as caught annually in the three years before video monitoring was mandated on the fishing vessels. In previous years, a ‘trigger limit’ was in place which required fishery managers to take action if the rate of turtle catch exceeded a certain level. This trigger limit has since been removed, which means there are no measures in place to cap the number of turtles caught in the tuna fishery. The relatively very low level of fishing activity in the WTBF in recent years significantly reduces the risk that fishery poses to threatened and endangered bycatch species.

Of particular concern; the ETBF has reported bycatch of between 20-68 critically endangered leatherback turtles per year since 2018. There are only 1000 mature nesters thought to be left in the population impacted by the ETBF, and it is declining at around 6% annually. For context, and demonstrating adequate management, a US-managed longline fishery that impacts the same leatherback turtle population is closed when yearly bycatch reaches 16 leatherbacks. If not for lower leatherback catch since 2020, the fishery was likely to have been red-listed. Immediate implementation of measures to reduce leatherback turtle bycatch to safe levels is required to avoid a red-listing in future.

In contrast, better protection arrangements and obligations on the fishery to protect seabirds have resulted in additional management that should effectively reduce the impact of the fishery. This is welcome.

Turtles, whales, dolphins and seabirds are at risk from multiple threats, including fishing. Given the small scale of the Australian tuna fishery relative to international tuna fisheries, it is unlikely that this fishery is the major driver of on-going population declines in these species of endangered wildlife.

Commonwealth marine parks were established in 2018, but in a form significantly delayed and weakened following sustained Australian tuna fishing industry lobbying. As such they confer only a fraction of the protection for threatened and endangered species of original government proposals.